How would you explain your product roadmap to an engineer who thinks all roadmaps are a waste of time?
Model answer
Model answerI wouldn't argue for roadmaps — I'd ask what problem they've had with them before. Usually the complaint is that roadmaps are treated as commitments that don't change. I'd reframe: this roadmap is a set of bets, not a promise. Each item represents a hypothesis about what will drive user value. Engineers shape those bets too — their input on effort changes prioritization. The roadmap isn't done to engineers; it's built with them.
Framework · Stakeholder Buy-in
- LListen first
Ask what their experience with roadmaps has been — understand the real objection - RReframe as bets
Roadmaps are hypotheses, not promises — this is a critical framing shift - IInvolve them
Engineers influence prioritization through effort estimates — make that explicit - AAcknowledge impermanence
A good roadmap changes. Communicate the why when it does
Related questions
- What is product-market fit and how would you know if you have it?
- You have 3 features requested by customers and only 1 sprint. How do you decide?
- How would you communicate a feature delay to stakeholders?
- How do you handle a situation where engineering says a feature is impossible?
- How do you say no to a stakeholder's feature request?